Note that she prevented, during the abductions, the father to see the children, when the father, as soon as he got the children back, offered of his own free will, the possibility, for the mother, to see the children.

I am Sebastian and I want a blonde woman to make happy. You must be careful with my computer and not cause problems.

And as being a woman, a mother etc, she really was unlucky or stupid to get a sentence of 30 days.

“You did an excellent job of missing the point and an excellent job of proving my point. Thank you”

What is the reason that you and your kind cannot accept the fact that the rest of the world – unlike you – consists of people with zero thought reading power? The fact that you think you have this ability, does not change the fact that people with less god-like fantasies about themselves accept (and suffer in discussions suchs as this) that they don’t have this ability.

I’m really tired of all these blog participants, who simply cannot write what they mean in an understandable way. But here’s two (pretty damn direct – so you should be able to confront them) questions for you:

Which point did I miss?
Which point did I prove?

I’m sure I’m not the only reader who missed on those accounts.

You did an excellent job of missing the point and an excellent job of proving my point. Thank you

That’s why hunting, sometimes without any ammunition for the rifle is rather popular male hobby, especially in the countryside.

“I lived in Finland for a few years and I do not comment using countless one sided documentaries as my evidence.”

So now you know where I’ve spent my life? And besides the ONE documentary (whose contents you cannot dispute unless you know which documentary it is – and afaik you don’t) I’ve mentioned, what else have I relied upon.

And is ONE documentary really countless for you? Then I suggest a visit to elementary school. ONE, TWO, THREE, and so on. You need to learn the basics.

“I also do not comment beyond my personal experience, my wife’s or Finnish friends’ opinions, or what I’ve read from reputable sources. I’m suspicious of agenda driven documentaries and never use them as a source.”

Once again, do you know this documetary. If you – as I suspect – do not, how do you know it’s AGENDA DRIVEN.

“You on the other hand, have watched and read a boatload of very partial mockumentaries about the US and use them as evidence.”

So now you somehow know what I’ve seen and read. Scary.

“One or two cases or events do not acurately reflect a country of over 300 million people.”

So then, you who are – oh so – knowledgeable, could maybe help a “mockumentary” duped scandinavian, to get to know the general system in use in the U.S. to aid people that have been thrown in prison although they are innocent? If people are thrown on the streets, after being in prison for +20 years being innocent, with no money available, then something sucks very very big time. Then ONE documented case is enough. You can’t hide behind the “statistics” shadow in cases like this.

“There is no other side to the story. You already know the answers.”

Well, if the story is, one guy is thrown in prison for 20+ years, and then thrown out on the streets, with no compensation, is there any other side to the story? Can a country (or state in the U.S. case) behaving in this way even be considered worthy of being given an “other side”? IMHO no.

And yes, given the facts I know of – I know the “answer” in this particular case. Doesn’t take a genious to crack this one.

“Now if you followed US news regularly, not as reported by Europeans but through regular American news outlets (like I do for Finnish and European news) such as foxnews.com;”

What are the outlets you follow up in europe to contrast the – oh so – impartial foxnews.com? ciaeuropereport.com or tony.lapdog.blair.go.uk? I wouldn’t even discuss FOX if i was serious. Apparently in the U.S. you still do.

“Story in short: Border agents shoot illegal alien drug smuggler in the butt and go to jail for 12 years.”

Oh oh. So nowadays it’s not even legal to shoot “illegal alien drug smugglers” in the U.S. What a crime against humanity. U.N. (or the frog-eating french) should send their “white flag of surrender”-vawing troops in to sort out this horrible crime against all human decency. Of course this guy deserves a medal instead of prison. Self-evident.

But times change. Not so long ago a proven mass-murderer (+200 victims) received the horrendous penalty of having to stay at home for 1 year. The impartial U.S. legal system at its prime. The fact that victims were vietnamese didn’t affect the verdict one bit.

And, contrary to what you self-centered U.S.-people might think: NO, this ISN’T news in Europe. So I find it amusing, that you even reflect on how this would be reported by europeans. What a joke.

Btw. Where was this “illegal alien drug smuggler” convicted of his “crimes”. I thought one was innocent until PROVEN guilty in the U.S. But we learn new things every day, thanks to the fine U.S. people writing to this – like the U.S. courts – impartial blog.

“Illegal alien drug smuggler does not even get prosecuted for his many crimes and is now sueing the US goverment for millions.”

So now even the fact that somebody is suing the U.S. government (or whatever) is evidence in support of a fair legal system? Get a fucking clue. I thought the verdicts were what matters.

“I don’t know about that, but it does seem to me, that he tries to estrange the boys from their mother.”

I think the “charmer” on the photo is John Rogers. That’s all I have to say. I don’t know anything about the Rogers-Koski deal. I simply find it strange that a kidnapper is somehow a saint, in the eyes of the oh so fair U.S. legal system.

I think most of the Finnish women who come here these days aren’t physcotic. Most of them are strong, independent nordic women. I think they come here because they are attracted to the strong, independant American men and they also enjoy breathing the fresh air of freedom.

At least that’s what they say.