Comments on: Asylum shopping in Finland http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/ Politics, current events, culture - From Finland & United States Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:56:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Smith http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-367475 Smith Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:23:21 +0000 /?p=733#comment-367475 It a nice site collecting all info about shopping goods. I need this info because i want to buy a good dress. Thanks It a nice site collecting all info about shopping goods.
I need this info because i want to buy a good dress.
Thanks

]]> By: ben lokholft http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-12876 ben lokholft Tue, 01 Nov 2005 01:12:52 +0000 /?p=733#comment-12876 pls let have freedom and all refuges they are not fools they help them selfs like pls let have freedom and all refuges they are not fools they help them selfs like

]]> By: Phil http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5138 Phil Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:35:45 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5138 <i>Are you a finnish citizen? If not, then don???t refer to finnish policies as OUR POLICIES.</i> I've heard that comment so many times from the jew-haters, black-haters, mexican-haters, foreigner-haters back in the states. "What you mean OUR country, nigger??" Are you a finnish citizen? If not, then don???t refer to finnish policies as OUR POLICIES.

I’ve heard that comment so many times from the jew-haters, black-haters, mexican-haters, foreigner-haters back in the states. “What you mean OUR country, nigger??”

]]> By: Helsinkian http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5132 Helsinkian Fri, 08 Jul 2005 08:33:24 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5132 I think it's schizophrenic if a resident has to talk about THEIR policies all the time. I think it's natural that someone like Phil would use first person plural both when he's talking about his old country and when he's talking about Finland. It's his choice to feel where he belongs spiritually and he can choose both if he wants to. There is no law stating that only the citizens among us have the right to feel that they're part of the country they live in. Anyone who pays taxes here has the right to say our policies. I think it’s schizophrenic if a resident has to talk about THEIR policies all the time. I think it’s natural that someone like Phil would use first person plural both when he’s talking about his old country and when he’s talking about Finland. It’s his choice to feel where he belongs spiritually and he can choose both if he wants to. There is no law stating that only the citizens among us have the right to feel that they’re part of the country they live in. Anyone who pays taxes here has the right to say our policies.

]]> By: Thomas http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5118 Thomas Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:44:10 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5118 "I???m sorry, I shouldn???t say ???OUR", I should say ???OURS??¦not including Thomas??" Are you a finnish citizen? If not, then don't refer to finnish policies as OUR POLICIES. “I???m sorry, I shouldn???t say ???OUR”, I should say ???OURS??¦not including Thomas??”

Are you a finnish citizen? If not, then don’t refer to finnish policies as OUR POLICIES.

]]> By: Phil http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5061 Phil Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:17:54 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5061 <i>???Looks like our strict immigration policies are known worldwide.?? OUR? </i> I'm sorry, I shouldn't say "OUR", I should say "OURS...not including Thomas" ???Looks like our strict immigration policies are known worldwide.??

OUR?

I’m sorry, I shouldn’t say “OUR”, I should say “OURS…not including Thomas”

]]> By: Thomas http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5050 Thomas Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:53:11 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5050 "I would rather support 1000 refugees in need ?” 120 euros a month in Russia, than 100 ???refugees?? in Finland ?” 1200 euros a month." Why is that? "Economical rationality" is not the reason obviously? “I would rather support 1000 refugees in need ?” 120 euros a month in Russia, than 100 ???refugees?? in Finland ?” 1200 euros a month.”

Why is that? “Economical rationality” is not the reason obviously?

]]> By: Thomas http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5049 Thomas Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:37:42 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5049 "Looks like our strict immigration policies are known worldwide." OUR? “Looks like our strict immigration policies are known worldwide.”

OUR?

]]> By: Toby http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5026 Toby Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:28:43 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5026 I refer you to my first point Hank - immigration (for economic or whatever reason) and asylum seeking (refugees) are different issues governed by different laws. I refer you to my first point Hank - immigration (for economic or whatever reason) and asylum seeking (refugees) are different issues governed by different laws.

]]> By: Hank W. http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-5011 Hank W. Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:49:55 +0000 /?p=733#comment-5011 Yes but Toby we were not talking of EU people but outside EU people here - or how many EU asylum seekers you've met? Yes but Toby we were not talking of EU people but outside EU people here - or how many EU asylum seekers you’ve met?

]]> By: Eino-Kalevi http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-4953 Eino-Kalevi Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:38:23 +0000 /?p=733#comment-4953 "I like the border controls between Finland & Sweden/Norway." I think it's too hard for the dogs! “I like the border controls between Finland & Sweden/Norway.”

I think it’s too hard for the dogs!

]]> By: Finnpundit http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-4945 Finnpundit Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:41:40 +0000 /?p=733#comment-4945 At least Finnish policy is not as moronic as that of the Canadians: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20050624.SYRIA24/BNPrint/theglobeandmail/TopStories At least Finnish policy is not as moronic as that of the Canadians:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20050624.SYRIA24/BNPrint/theglobeandmail/TopStories

]]> By: Toby http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-4937 Toby Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:55:16 +0000 /?p=733#comment-4937 Oh yeah - and this one: "Finland is under no obligation to except such immigration and it should not." Wrong again. It would have to leave the EU to be able to deny me, as an EU citizen, entry. Oh yeah - and this one: “Finland is under no obligation to except such immigration and it should not.” Wrong again. It would have to leave the EU to be able to deny me, as an EU citizen, entry.

]]> By: Toby http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-4936 Toby Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:53:19 +0000 /?p=733#comment-4936 Greg, A couple of points: "These colonialists have completely taken over Britain (45% of the population" 1) You are totally wrong - from the 2001 census: "First detailed results on ethnicity and religion from the 2001 Census reveal that 87.5 per cent of the population of England and Wales (seven out of eight people) gave their ethnic group as White British." (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/commentaries/ethnicity.asp) You'll have to look up the Scottish results yourself, but Scotland has LESS immigration than England and Wales. And 2) even if you were right, which you aren't, how could 45% be considered as "completely overtaken"? I might only have GCSE maths, but last time I checked 45% percent was called a minority. I don't know what your beef is, but at least start by getting your facts straight. Greg, A couple of points:

“These colonialists have completely taken over Britain (45% of the population”

1) You are totally wrong - from the 2001 census: “First detailed results on ethnicity and religion from the 2001 Census reveal that 87.5 per cent of the population of England and Wales (seven out of eight people) gave their ethnic group as White British.” (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/commentaries/ethnicity.asp) You’ll have to look up the Scottish results yourself, but Scotland has LESS immigration than England and Wales. And 2) even if you were right, which you aren’t, how could 45% be considered as “completely overtaken”? I might only have GCSE maths, but last time I checked 45% percent was called a minority. I don’t know what your beef is, but at least start by getting your facts straight.

]]> By: Hank W. http://www.finlandforthought.net/2005/06/29/asylum-shopping-in-finland/#comment-4924 Hank W. Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:40:04 +0000 /?p=733#comment-4924 And just for any romanians reading this:In finland there is a law requiring to remove obstructions on the road to traffic by any means possible. And just for any romanians reading this:In finland there is a law requiring to remove obstructions on the road to traffic by any means possible.

]]>